On January 23, 2012, Plaintiff s president, Alan Salmon, sent an email to Defendant Regency Furniture, Inc. While Defendants motion for summary judgment pended in that case, the Parties engaged in settlement negotiations. Defendants moved for summary judgment in that case. Plaintiff added that this practice 1 enabled Defendants to sell the same plan to multiple customers, thereby depriving Plaintiff of the benefit of the Parties alleged bargain. Plaintiff further alleged that Defendants would sell customers furniture protection plans without giving the customers physical copies of the plans. In that case, Plaintiff alleged that Defendants contracted with it to buy furniture protection plans that, in turn, they sold to customers who bought furniture from their stores. Plaintiff filed a Complaint sounding in breach of contract in Civil Action 8:11-cv-00453AW (D. Defendants are a group of furniture stores that operate under the names of Regency Furniture and Ashley Furniture Industries. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff Montage Furniture Services, LLC supplies furniture protection plans to furniture retailers. For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment and DENIES Plaintiff s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court has carefully reviewed the record and deems a hearing unnecessary. MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court are (1) Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment and (2) Plaintiff s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND SOUTHERN DIVISION MONTAGE FURNITURE SERVICES, LLC, Plaintiff, v.
1 Comment
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |